The Little Pink Clubhouse

January 30, 2009

Senator Claire McCaskill, you RAWK: Let’s cap compensation for Wall Street “idiots”!

Filed under: Government hearings - more fun than reality TV, politics, rants — strategerie @ 1:18 pm

Senator McCaskill, go get ‘em!

This is the Best. Idea. Ever.

Most of us read yesterday that certain beneficiaries of the Wall Street bailout gave eighteen billion dollars in bonuses to their executives as a result. Yes. EIGHTEEN BILLION DOLLARS! They ran their companies and the United States economy into the ground, but they still deserved a bonus?!?

Senator McCaskill thinks it’s time we fought back. She’s mad as hell, and she’s not going to take it anymore*!

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/30/executive.pay/index.html

One day after President Barack Obama ripped Wall Street executives for their “shameful” decision to hand out $18 billion in bonuses in 2008, Congress may finally have had enough.

An angry U.S. senator introduced legislation Friday to cap compensation for employees of any company that accepts federal bailout money. Under the terms of a bill introduced by Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Missouri, no employee would be allowed to make more than the president of the United States.

Obama’s current annual salary is $400,000.

“We have a bunch of idiots on Wall Street that are kicking sand in the face of the American taxpayer,” an enraged McCaskill said on the floor of the Senate. “They don’t get it. These people are idiots. You can’t use taxpayer money to pay out $18 billion in bonuses.”

When taxpayers all over this country are losing their jobs at record rates, when Citibank didn’t cancel the order for their new corporate jet till the Obama administration leaned on them to do it, when those receiving our billions STILL thought they were entitled to an obscene amount of money in bonuses, isn’t it time to rein these guys in?

I think Senator McCaskill is just the woman for the job!

-S

*Did anyone ever think that “Network”, which was meant to be satire, would ever become truth?

Dr. Stephen Colbert, DFA, strikes again: The Audacity of Nope

Filed under: fun and frolic, politics — strategerie @ 8:50 am

We had an earthquake earlier this morning. It was, evidently, a 4.5 on the Richter scale. I slept through it.

In the meantime, Stephen Colbert, will you have my baby?

http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/217132/january-29-2009/the-word—the-audacity-of-nope

-S

January 27, 2009

Jurors weep at details of “Baby Grace” torture

Filed under: rants — strategerie @ 11:36 pm

Riley Ann Sawyers

(AP Photo/Courtesy of Sheryl Ann Sawyers, File)

I wish I had the words to adequately express my fury at someone, anyone, who would perpetrate a crime so mindbogglingly awful on a two-year-old.

I don’t believe in the death penalty. I don’t think it’s effective, I don’t think it’s a deterrent, and I definitely don’t want to spend several times what it costs to keep someone in prison for life to hasten their death. At the same time, this kind of stuff makes me wonder what punishment could be heinous enough. The parents that did such unspeakable things to an innocent little girl are monsters.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090128/ap_on_re_us/child_s_remains

Jurors wept Tuesday watching a woman describe how teaching her 2-year-old daughter proper manners turned into a daylong torture session in which the toddler was beaten with belts, dunked in cold water and flung across a room so violently that she died.

Kimberly Trenor, 20, detailed the abuse in a videotaped statement played for jurors during the first day of her capital murder trial.

Trenor, 20, told investigators in the statement that she hit her daughter with a thick leather belt to teach her to say “please” and “yes, sir.”

The little victim was dubbed “Baby Grace” by investigators who worked to identify her decomposed remains after the body was found in a plastic container in October 2007 on a tiny island in Galveston Bay.

Trenor’s 25-year-old husband, Royce Zeigler II, is to be tried separately on murder charges. His attorney argues that Trenor is responsible for the child’s death.

But Trenor insisted it was her husband who became so enraged when the toddler didn’t behave better that he hurled her several times across a room, ultimately fracturing her skull and killing her.

Even more sickening, if it’s possible: Further in the account of what happened to little Riley is the fact that she reached out to her mother, saying “I love you” as she was so horribly beaten.

The defendants should be thankful every day of their lives I’m not a judge. At the same time, what on earth could avenge this little girl’s death?

Riley, if there is such a place as Heaven, I hope you are there. As for your parents, Karma, do your work!

-S

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse makes a speech for the ages: As We Look Forward We Must Also Look Back

Filed under: politics — strategerie @ 9:23 am

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse

Photo: law.rwu.edu

My friend Leinie has a long-standing crush on Senator Whitehouse. He’s pretty hot. After all, what’s better than smart, huh?

Senator Whitehouse delivered this speech on the floor of the Senate January 21st. I think his words are so deathless that I’ve reproduced it here.

Thanks, Senator Whitehouse, for reminding us once more how high the stakes are. We must get this right. There is no do-over with other people’s lives and futures.

-S

http://whitehouse.senate.gov/newsroom/speeches/speech/?id=363e165f-3e42-4130-bb39-dbb7b765d5ee

I rise as we celebrate a new President, a new administration, a new mode of governing, and a new future for America.

Even in the gloom of our present predicaments, Americans’ hearts are strong and confident because we see a brighter future ahead.

President Obama looks to that future. Given the depth and severity of those predicaments, we need all his energy to look forward to lead us to that brighter day; forward to what Winston Churchill in Britain’s dark days called those “broad and sunlit uplands.”

But, as we steer toward this broad and sunlit future, what about the past? As the President looks forward and charts a new course, must someone not also look back, to take an accounting of where we are, what was done, and what must now be repaired.

Our new President has said, “America needs to look forward.” I agree.

Our new Attorney-General designate has said, we should not criminalize policy differences. I agree.

And I hope we can all agree that summoning young sacrificial lambs to prosecute, as we did after the Abu Ghraib disaster, would be reprehensible.

But consider the pervasive, deliberate, and systematic damage the Bush Administration did to America, to her finest traditions and institutions, to her reputation and integrity.

I evaluate that damage in history’s light. Although I’m no historian, here is what I believe:

The story of humankind on this Earth has been a long and halting march from the darkness of barbarism and the principle that to the victor go the spoils, to the light of organized civilization and freedom. During that long and halting march, this light of progress has burned, sometimes brightly and sometimes softly, in different places at different times around the world.

The light shone in Athens, when that first Senate made democracy a living experiment; and again in the softer but broader glow of the Roman Empire and Senate.

That light burned brightly, incandescently, in Jerusalem, when Jesus of Nazareth cast his lot with the weak and the powerless.

The light burned in Damascus, Baghdad, Cairo and Cordoba, when the Arab world kept science, mathematics, art, and logic alive, as Europe descended into Dark Ages of plague and violence.

The light flashed from the fields of Runnymede when English nobles forced King John to sign the Magna Carta, and glowed steadily from that island kingdom as England developed Parliament and the common law, and was the first to stand against slavery.

It rekindled in Europe at the time of the Reformation, with a bright flash in 1517 when Martin Luther nailed his edicts to the Wittenberg cathedral doors, and faced with excommunication, stated “Here I stand. I can do no other.”

Over the years across the globe, that light, and the darkness of tyranny and cruelty, have ebbed and flowed.

But for the duration of our Republic, even though our Republic is admittedly imperfect, that light has shone more brightly and more steadily here in this Republic than in any place on earth: as we adopted the Constitution, the greatest achievement yet in human freedom; as boys and men bled out of shattered bodies into sodden fields at Antietam and Chicamagua, Shiloh and Gettysburg to expiate the sin of slavery; as we rebuilt shattered enemies, now friends, overseas and came home after winning world wars; and as we threw off bit by bit ancient shackles of race and gender to make this a more perfect union for all of us.

What made this bright and steady glow possible? What made it possible is not that we are better people, I believe, but that our system of government is government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Why else does our President take his oath to defend a Constitution of the United States of America? Our unique form of self-government is a blessing, and we hold it in trust; not just for us, but for our children and grandchildren down through history; not just for us, but as an example out through the world.

That is why our Statue of Liberty raises a lamp to other nations still engloomed in tyranny.

That is why we stand as a beacon in this world, beckoning to all who seek a kinder, freer, brighter future.

We hold this unique gift in trust for the future and the world. Each generation assumes responsibility for this Republic and its government, and each generation takes on a special obligation when they do. Our new President closed his Inaugural Address by setting forth the challenge against which future generations will test us: whether “with eyes fixed on the horizon and God’s grace upon us, we carried forth that great gift of freedom and delivered it safely to future generation.” There are no guarantees that we will – this is a continuing experiment we are embarked upon – and a lot is at stake; indeed, the most precious thing of man’s creation on the face of the Earth is at stake. That is what I believe.

So from that perspective, what about the past? No one can deny that in the last eight years America’s bright light has dimmed and flickered, darkening our country and darkening the world.

The price of that is incalculable. There are nearly 7 billion human souls on this world. Every morning, the sun rises anew over their villages and hamlets and barrios, and every day they can choose where to invest their hopes, their confidence, and their dreams.

I submit that when America’s light shines brightly, when honesty, freedom, justice and compassion glow from our institutions, it attracts those hopes, those dreams; and the force of those 7 billion hopes and dreams, the confidence of those 7 billion souls in our lively experiment, is, I believe, the strongest power in our national arsenal – stronger than atom bombs. We risk it at our peril.

And of course when our own faith is diminished at home, this vital light only dims further, again at incalculable cost.

So when an administration rigs the intelligence process and produces false evidence to send our country to war;

When an administration descends to interrogation techniques of the Inquisition, of Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge – descends to techniques that we have prosecuted as crimes in military tribunals and federal courts;

When institutions as noble as the Department of Justice and as vital as the Environmental Protection Agency are systematically and deliberately twisted from their missions by odious means of institutional sabotage;

When the integrity of our markets and the fiscal security of our budget are opened wide to the frenzied greed of corporations, speculators and contractors;

When the integrity of public officials; the warnings of science; the honesty of government procedures; and the careful historic balance of our separated powers of government, are all seen as obstacles to be overcome and not attributes to be celebrated;

When taxpayers are cheated, and the forces of government ride to the rescue of the cheaters and punish the whistleblowers;

When a government turns the guns of official secrecy against its own people to mislead, confuse and propagandize them;

When government ceases to even try to understand the complex topography of the difficult problems it is our very purpose and duty to solve, and instead cares only for these points where it intersects with the party ideology, so that the purpose of government becomes no longer to solve problems, but only to work them for political advantage;

In short, when you have pervasive infiltration into all the halls of government – judicial, legislative, and executive – of the most ignoble forms of influence; when you see systematic dismantling of historic processes and traditions of government that are the safeguards of our democracy; and when you have a bodyguard of lies, jargon, and propaganda emitted to fool and beguile the American people…

Well, something very serious in the history of our republic has gone wrong, something that dims the light of progress for all humanity.

As we look forward, as we begin the task of rebuilding this nation, we have an abiding duty to determine how great the damage is. I say this in no spirit of vindictiveness or revenge. I say it because the thing that was sullied is so, so precious; and I say it because the past bears upon the future. If people have been planted in government in violation of our civil service laws to serve their party and their ideology instead of serving the public, the past will bear upon the future. If procedures and institutions of government have been corrupted and are not put right, that past will assuredly bear on the future. In an ongoing enterprise like government, the door cannot be so conveniently closed on the closets of the past. The past always bears on the future.

Moreover, a democracy is not just a static institution, it is a living education – an ongoing education in freedom of a people. As Harry Truman said addressing a joint session of Congress back in 1947, “One of the chief virtues of a democracy is that its defects are always visible, and under democratic processes can be pointed out and corrected.”

Entirely apart from tentacles of the past that may reach into the future, are the lessons we as a people have to learn from this past carnival of folly, greed, lies, and sabotage, so that it can, under democratic processes, be pointed out and corrected.

If we blind ourselves to this history, if we pull an invisibility cloak over it, we will deny ourselves its lessons. Those lessons came at too painful a cost to ignore. Those lessons merit discovery, disclosure and discussion. Indeed, disclosure and discussion is the difference between a valuable lesson for the bright upward forces of our democracy, and a blueprint for darker forces to return and do it all over again.

A little bright, healthy sunshine and fresh air, so that an educated population knows what was done and how, can show where the tunnels were bored, when the truth was subordinated; what institutions were subverted; how our democracy was compromised; so this grim history is not condemned to repeat itself; so a knowing public in the clarity of day can say, “Never, never, never, again;” so we can keep that light – that light that is at once America’s greatest gift and greatest strength – brightly shining. To do this, I submit, we must look back.

I yield the floor.

January 26, 2009

Rush Limbaugh says that Barack Obama is “frightened of me”.

Filed under: Idiots, Scoundrels, and All-Around Undesirables, politics, rants — strategerie @ 10:43 pm

I’m resisting the impulse to ROTFLMAOPIMP, Dude. This is the most amusing thing I’ve read in, well, years.

Rush Limbaugh thinks Barack Obama is scared of him. Oooh. Yeah.  You keep thinking that, Mr. Limbaugh. In the meantime, I could get really nasty here, but I won’t. I’ll simply say that you’re delusional.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/01/26/limbaugh-obama-is-frightened-of-me/

Radio host Rush Limbaugh said Monday that President Obama is “frightened of me.”

“He’s obviously more frightened of me than he is [Senate Minority Leader] Mitch McConnell,” Limbaugh told listeners. “He’s more frightened of me, then he is of say, [House Minority Leader] John Boehner, which doesn’t say much about our party.”

Limbaugh’s comments followed reports Obama warned GOP congressional leaders last week that they should stop listening to the conservative talker, who had said on air he wanted the new president to fail.

It’s always interesting to note that there are people in our world who have no problem doing anything for a paycheck, aren’t there?

-S

Black Monday: Over 50,000 jobs lost in the USA today

Filed under: Uncategorized — strategerie @ 4:29 pm

If you’re looking for work, my advice is to stay away from news sources.

As of this morning, Sprint, GM, Pfizer, IMG Group, Home Depot and Caterpillar are teaming up to eliminate 50,000+ jobs from our economy.

In the meantime, it’ll be interesting to see what happens when the state of California runs out of money; it’s evidently supposed to happen within the next two weeks.

-S

Why can’t professional athletes stay out of trouble?

Filed under: Local news, football, rants — strategerie @ 1:44 pm

Just one more yearly tradition: Another Seahawks linebacker, LeRoy Hill, sits on Rex Grossman of the Bears.

(AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)

LeRoy Hill of the Seattle Seahawks had a very eventful weekend. It seems he attracted some attention from law enforcement outside Atlanta, GA. Being unconscious behind the wheel of a car, in an intersection, with not only the scent of marijuana but some of the substance in one’s vehicle will do that. Oh, yeah: He allegedly admitted to drinking as well.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/seahawks/2008667833_hawk25.html

The Atlanta police got right on that one. It seems they didn’t even Breathalyze Mr. Hill. Nice to know that Atlanta’s Finest takes such a charitable attitude towards someone who obviously was just trying to get home, huh? I’ll bet if Mr. Hill was, say, a plumber or worked in a fast-food restaurant, they’d treat him exactly the same way.

Here’s the burning question of the day. Since I am not a pro athlete, it might be interesting to ask one my questions, but they’re a little busy, aren’t they?

If anyone wanted to pay ME eight million dollars a year (give or take a few million,) to do something legal for a living, I’m thinking that would be eight million reasons to keep my nose clean. Wouldn’t you? After all, pro football’s a tough sport, but for those who can hang on past the typical four-year career (the league average,) the hills are alive with the sound of money, aren’t they? How difficult would it be to stay out of situations and away from people who are nothing but trouble? Obviously, it’s a Herculean task.

It’s also a good thing to not screw up when one is testing the free agent market as well, but remember: Not a pro athlete.

Do these guys have nothing else to do with their time? Seriously. Do they need minders? Let’s see here: Don’t drink and drive. Don’t use illicit substances. After all, if you don’t get caught initially, there’s always the specter of the random NFL drug testing. (There’s a hilarious blog entry by Nate Jackson of the Broncos re: the drug testing; I wish I could FIND IT again…) Don’t play with guns. (Someone in the Giants front office may want to make an extra effort on that one.) Don’t hit women. The last one seems pretty self-explanatory to me. Not only is it illegal, people tend to take a dim view of a guy who’s exponentially bigger and stronger menacing a female. There’s a good reason for this, too.

I realize that most of us enjoy a little frivolity once in awhile. That desire takes on many forms, doesn’t it? They run the gamut of “let’s get loaded” to a five-mile run. Maybe it’s my advanced age, but by this time, nothing’s worth that hangover. The vast majority of our friends have a couple of drinks when we get together, then stop. Amazingly enough, we can still have fun, and nobody gets arrested as a result. It would seem to me that those with the financial resources of pro athletes could have all kinds of fun without the resulting headlines. After all, cab fare isn’t that expensive, is it? They could even hire a driver if they were so inclined. If the guy in question knew that he had a problem with aggression, he could easily afford the anger management classes and/or therapy.

There’s someone over at www.seahawkaddicts.com who insists that since these guys have the egos and the aggression to play pro football, they’re going to do things that others would avoid, just because they think they can get away with it. I guess I wonder about that one, too. Wouldn’t it be better to not draw attention to yourself in this manner? For the numbers who can’t get through an off-season without coming to the attention of law enforcement, there are others who seem to avoid getting themselves in trouble. I must confess being a bit more than curious about this. Obviously, they’re made of sterner stuff, or they’re just smart enough to realize they don’t want to screw up the rest of their lives for one evening out.

There’s a wide cross section of humanity that reads TLPC. Maybe one of the guys I’ve mentioned might want to enlighten all of us as to why this happens. My contact information is above. In the meantime, I’m off to get some things done.

-S

January 25, 2009

Are drug companies suppressing cures for disease?

Filed under: rants — strategerie @ 11:20 am

I’ll resist the impulse to make the usual jokes over the obvious, re: Is the Pope a Catholic? Does a bear poop in the woods?

For everyone who suffers from a chronic disease (and has occasionally wondered if their misery is a profit center for a drug company,) here’s some additional ammunition for that view.

http://www.columbiaspectator.com/2009/01/23/scientist-revives-research

Twelve years ago, Irving Weissman discovered a treatment that might have saved the lives of thousands of women with advanced breast cancer, but pharmaceutical companies weren’t interested in developing the therapy. Though that interest is finally being reignited, Weissman doesn’t pull any punches. “I hate to say I told you so,” he said.

Weissman, a professor of pathology and developmental biology at Stanford University, spoke Wednesday and Thursday as part of the Columbia University Department of Religion’s Bampton Lecture series. The lecture series is modeled after a centuries-old Oxford series of the same name, and invites famous authorities in their respective fields to give talks on various issues of interest to the religious community.

In Wednesday’s lecture, Weissman laid out the conceptual foundation of his work—that stem cells are rare, self-renewing, and can regenerate body tissues. Weissman repeatedly expressed frustration that while many of his discoveries seemed to hold remarkable potential for life-saving treatments, commercial or regulatory hurdles have prevented his scientific research from benefiting human beings.

One example is Weissman’s mid-’90s research on type I diabetes, in which he demonstrated the ability to fully cure type I diabetes in mice using stem cells. But even though the experiments avoided political controversy by using so-called adult stem cells, which do not come from embryos, Weissman ran into a road block when pharmaceutical companies refused to sponsor clinical trials. The therapy went nowhere. Weissman implied that the pharmaceutical companies had put profit over principle, preferring to keep diabetes sufferers dependent on costly insulin than to cure them once and for all.

“He has a long history of being at the forefront of his field,” Arthur Palmer, professor of structural biology at Columbia said, remarking that Weissman has never been afraid to challenge scientific orthodoxy.

So, let me get this straight. It’s okay for untold millions to suffer from diseases like breast cancer, Parkinson’s, diabetes and the rest, because stem cell research is Evil. Plus, Big Pharma needs to make some big profits, don’t they?

Here’s an example: I have a chronic illness that is treated by a once-a-day prescription medication. I have no idea if stem cells could cure my condition. At the same time, the drug that is prescribed to roughly 13 million people in the USA who have the same thing I do wasn’t even subjected to clinical trials for effectiveness till five years ago. Yes, you read that correctly.

It’s time to ask some hard questions about the billions per year generated by treating conditions that could be cured with research, isn’t it?

-S

January 23, 2009

Tag. I’m it: Six things that make me happy

Filed under: fun and frolic — strategerie @ 2:52 pm

Okay. One of my friends is doing some kind of tag thing. This means that I must tag six other people, they have to answer, and we can all share the excitement.

The Rules:

Link to the person who tagged you.
Write down six things that make you happy.
Post these rules.
Tag six others.
Notify me that you’ve tagged six others–or not.
AND please check out the websites of the folks I TAGGED — see the links below.

The person that tagged me:

http://lesadragon.blogspot.com

Six things that make me happy:

  1. Football. Well, except the Patriots, the Cowboys, and pretty much the Steelers.
  2. Chocolate
  3. Bubble baths
  4. A great book, and lots of time to read
  5. Snuggling on the couch with The Dauphin
  6. Getting together with my girlfriends.

The other people I tagged:

Julia Hunter http://www.julia-hunter.com

Judy

Samantha (new mommy!)

Colleen

Kristan Higgins www.kristanhiggins.com

Have fun, ladies!

-S

January 20th: Better than Christmas morning

Filed under: politics — strategerie @ 12:07 am

Cartoon by Horsey. If you’d like to see the original, please go to http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/horsey/viewbydate.asp?id=1889

In the past two days, Guantanamo Bay is ordered closed within a year, the United States has ceased the use of torture on prisoners under any circumstances, the wheels are in motion to end our involvement in Iraq over the next sixteen months, and I wake up in the morning wondering what he’ll do today, instead of dreading what’s now been done in my name and the names of all Americans.

Mostly, I wake up smiling.

-S

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.