The Little Pink Clubhouse

June 29, 2007

Friday Afternoon Cat Blogging, and what’s this about “The Bachelor”?

Filed under: Idiots, Scoundrels, and All-Around Undesirables, cat blogging, rants — strategerie @ 12:31 pm

P2110027.jpg

Meet Drake, a six-month-old red and cream tabby Maine Coon.  He’s quite fond of carrot cake.

I also wanted to post something I just read at http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/ about the upcoming season of “The Bachelor”. Evidently, women are washing out of the competitor pool in large numbers because of STD’s. Since “The Bachelor” is my all-time favorite craptastic TV, I was pretty intrigued by this “information.” (Here’s a linky: http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2007/06/28/the_bachelor_producers_hit_with_herpes_d ) It’s in a tabloid, therefore, it must be true.

My first reaction: Are the “bachelors” tested for STD’s as well?

Just wondering,

-S

p.s. Okay, I’m still thinking about “The Bachelor” contestants. According to the article, the highest numbers infected are women over 30. Those quoted claim it’s over 50% of those attempting to become contestants. Of course, we’re taking all of this with a grain of salt the size of the average lick, but ladies, ladies, LADIES, did you not get the memo? An STD is the least of your problems these days. How’d you like to contract something that will kill you? HIV and AIDS are not a joke! Am I the only one that finds this astounding?

I remember dating. Of course, I was dating when dinosaurs roamed the earth, but if I heard it once, I heard it a thousand times, and it was pretty much the dealbreaker: The person you were getting busy with always used a condom. No exceptions. EVER! Have things changed that much in the past fifteen years or so? Are single people feeling that it’s not that important anymore because people with HIV are living much longer than they previously did due to advances in research and drug therapies? I do NOT understand.

In the meantime, hopefully, I’ll get some comments about this.

It’s Friday. Does this mean I get to write about whatever I’d like?

Filed under: America's Hottest Prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, Uncategorized — strategerie @ 10:04 am

cialeakcase.jpg

Yes, my blog has just turned into an issue of Tiger Beat, circa 1975. (“Patrick Fitzgerald’s Turn-Ons and Turn-Offs!!!”, “Foldout Kissing Poster!!!!”) Can’t a girl have one totally unexplainable and really ridiculous crush on a public figure? Huh? Judging by the number of hits the blog gets whenever I’ve posted a photo of the man, there seems to be a lot of us!

In the meantime, Friday Afternoon Cat Blogging will be a bit early today. I’m accompanying my young friends Lauren and Emily to the Dilettante Cafe later, which I’m fairly excited about. http://www.dilettante.com/ If you ever wanted to experience Death By Chocolate, the Dilettante’s the place. It’s owned by a guy whose grandfather was the chocolatier to Tsar Nicholas. The young ladies (and their brother,) are in the US visiting their dad and my great friend Julie-anne, and of course, they can’t leave without trying to eat a hot fudge sundae the size of the average adult’s head. It wouldn’t be right, would it? (I’m wondering if we’ll have enough time to cram in a visit to Nordstrom, too. Don’t tell their dad!)

I hope everyone’s having a great Friday!

-S

June 28, 2007

Personal to my college buddy Daver the chowderhead

Filed under: baseball — strategerie @ 6:15 am

SafecoField.jpg 

How are you? I hope everything’s great. Remember when we used to argue about baseball? You told me that the Red Sox were oh, so much better than my Seattle Mariners.

The Mariners swept your Red Sox. That’s right.

You so owe me.

Fondly,
-S

June 27, 2007

Alberto Gonzales finally deigns to meet with the family of Tom Wales

Filed under: US Attorney Purge, politics, rants — strategerie @ 9:48 pm

Heckuva job, Mr. Attorney General! I’ll bet you told them you’d actually start offering resources to find his murderer, too, didn’t you? It’s only been five and a half years!

Those who are reading my blog from other areas of the country may not be familiar with Tom Wales. Mr. Wales was an Assistant US Attorney in Seattle. From all reports I’ve read, he was very good at what he did, and highly regarded in the community as well. Mr. Wales was also the president of Washington CeaseFire, a nonprofit organization dedicated to reducing gun violence in Washington State. If you’d like to read more about Washington CeaseFire, please go here: http://www.washingtonceasefire.org/ I’m sure you’ll appreciate the sickening irony of the fact that Mr. Wales died as a result of being shot while he sat working at his computer in his home.

Mr. Wales’ case has never been solved.  Evidently, John McKay, former US Attorney of Western Washington, contacted the Justice Department to ask for additional help and resources to find the killer and bring him to justice. The response of the Attorney General’s office was to begin the discussion surrounding the firing of Mr. McKay. After all, we can’t have these upstart US Attorneys daring to investigate, arrest and try the murderer of a federal prosecutor, especially one that evidently didn’t share the political beliefs of the party currently in power. Even more frightening, there is a suspect in this case who has never been arrested. It just wasn’t a priority for the Bush White House to go after the unnamed suspect, was it?

If you live in the area, you’ve read about this. I was trapped staying in a hotel room at a local resort a few months back and found a copy of “Seattle Magazine” with a great article on the above subject. Mr. Wales’ brother has also spoken out about the absolute lack of action in this case. Let’s see whom I can link to if you’d like to read more. http://www.horsesass.org/?p=2892 I’d also like to post the article from today’s Seattle Times for those who’d like to see it: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003764552_webgonzales27m.html I wonder why Mr. Wales’ brother wasn’t at the meeting.

In the meantime, Mr. Gonzales’ remarks to a group of tech executives in Seattle this morning was supposed to be open to the public. That invitation was quickly withdrawn.

-S

Yoo-hoo! Mr. Vice President! Subpoena for you!

Filed under: Government hearings - more fun than reality TV, politics — strategerie @ 7:45 pm

WhiteHouse.jpg

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070628/ap_on_go_co/eavesdropping_subpoenas&printer=1;_ylt=AqgOI2SNGhZt79dbCHcmacuMwfIE 

White House, Cheney’s Office Subpoenaed

By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer 29 minutes ago

The Senate subpoenaed the White House and Vice President Dick Cheney’s office Wednesday, demanding documents and elevating the confrontation with President Bush over the administration’s warrant-free eavesdropping on Americans.

Separately, the Senate Judiciary Committee also is summoning Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to discuss the program and an array of other matters that have cost a half-dozen top Justice Department officials their jobs, committee chairman Patrick Leahy announced.

Leahy, D-Vt., raised questions about previous testimony by one of Bush’s appeals court nominees and said he wouldn’t let such matters pass.

“If there have been lies told to us, we’ll refer it to the Department of Justice and the U.S. attorney for whatever legal action they think is appropriate,” Leahy told reporters. He did just that Wednesday, referring questions about testimony by former White House aide Brett Kavanaugh, who now sits on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

I’m wondering if:

  1. Senator Leahy and the Senate Judiciary Committee are going “all in” on this one. Will they send the Sergeant of Arms to arrest those who do not comply with these subpoenaes?
  2. Has Dick Cheney had even a nanosecond of regret today about telling Senator Leahy to perform a physically impossible act on himself on the floor of the Senate?
  3. Did anyone from the Senate Judiciary Committee read John Dean’s advice on these hearings — turn them over to a trial attorney, and let him or her ask the questions and elicit testimony? I wonder if there’s a trial attorney in our midst who’s unimpressed by political party or job titles, does his job (according to Al Gore,) “without fear or favor” and might be able to get some answers here. Is there such a person? Anyone? Anyone? There’s gotta’ be someone. It’s on the tip of my tongue. Really.
  4. Will Condoleezza Rice go shoe shopping before her next SJC testimony?      

I know I’ll be following this one carefully.

-S

June 26, 2007

All your catnip are belong to us.

Filed under: cat blogging — strategerie @ 10:28 pm

kittystretch.jpg

Photo: Fritz Reiss/AP

The above feline is enjoying his day at Berlin’s new animal shelter, which can hold up to 12,000 cats.

Here’s to Mr. Tabby finding a loving new home (and his very own people!) as soon as possible.

-S

June 25, 2007

I’ll be the one with her nose pressed up against the bookstore window tomorrow morning.

Filed under: book reviews, romance authors, writing — strategerie @ 10:13 am

 TheUnfortunateMissFortunes.jpg

I’ll bet you thought I was going to write something about Harry Potter’s latest adventures coming out, didn’t you? Don’t get me wrong. I’m waiting for that, too. I’m even going to the midnight party at the local bookstore.

In the interest of full disclosure, I am a voracious reader. I’ll read just about anything. There is a constant stack of unread books beside our bed, and I lust after books the way some women fantasize about a Birkin bag or an unlimited Nordstrom shopping spree. Plus, I’m an author’s fangirl. If I read your book and I loved it, if I get a chance to talk with you about it, I’m thrilled. I write because I hope, in my deepest heart of hearts, that someday I will have a woman standing in front of me telling me that she loved my book as well.

Two of my favorites have a new book coming out tomorrow morning.  I’m not the biggest paranormals fan, but if Jennifer Crusie and Anne Stuart have written one, I’m going to read it. I’m not as familiar with Eileen Dreyer, but she is surely in their league as well. I was just reading the excerpt of the book at http://www.unfortunatemissfortunes.com/homepage.php , and the following leaped off the page at me. I HAVE to read this book now!

But for some reason, this man suddenly made her feel like a nun peering out the convent gate, longing for what she could never have.

I have no idea what the author is talking about here. Really.

In the meantime, I’ll be the one with her nose pressed up against the bookstore window tomorrow morning. I can’t wait for my copy of “The Unfortunate Miss Fortunes”.

-S

June 24, 2007

We saw “SiCKO” last night in Seattle

Filed under: movie reviews — strategerie @ 10:45 am

I’ve been waiting to see this film since I read that it was being made. Just like everyone else, we have our fair share of health care horror stories. The Dauphin has a chronic illness. The only thing standing between us and financial ruin is the fact that the industry he works in typically offers outstanding health insurance as a benefit. Also, my mother died as the result of a drug study, so I’m pretty passionate on the subject of drug companies and the fact that it’s now, and has always been, profits over patients.

First of all, I believe this to be the best work of Michael Moore’s career. Instead of the sledgehammer he’s used in the past, he’s walking softly and carrying a heavy stick. This movie sneaks up on you. “SiCKO” is much more powerful in its own way than both “Bowling For Columbine” and “Fahrenheit 9/11″. Its message is much more subtle. Not only was the filmmaker attempting to get all of us to understand the huge financial and personal cost of the health care crisis in the United States, he was trying to show that we must work together to find our way out of it. Our society is just as sick as the health care CEO’s that are taking multi-million dollar salaries while condemning subscribers to sub-standard care in the name of bonuses and stock options.

I will be curious to know what others here thought of the movie; I told DH on the drive home that anyone who thinks about what they’ve just seen will find themselves coming to some fairly tough conclusions. Our elected representatives on both sides of the aisle have shamelessly and repeatedly bellied up to the health insurance money trough, and now that bill’s come due. If we are serious about universal health care in the United States — and at this point, we have no other choice — they will have to go. Every last one of them.

Every last one of us knows someone who has been drastically affected by health care costs, or is someone who does not have health insurance. Of course, there are multiple stories of those who lost everything because they were uninsured, their insurance company denied their claim (wait, ladies, till you see the woman who was denied coverage of a VERY expensive surgery because she had a routine female health complaint,) or because they just could not get treatment for whatever illness they had.

One of the most telling statements of the film came from a former member of Parliament. He made the statement that Britain decided they had no other choice than to institute their national health care coverage because, as he said, (paraphrased,) “If we had the money to kill people, we had the money to pay for health care.”

The footage in Cuba will break the hearts of the most hardened. Imagine a first responder at the World Trade Center on September 11th, now desperately ill and can’t get adequate treatment in the USA because she can’t afford it, being told that not only would she be getting the care she needs, it won’t cost her a cent. The inhaler she needed in the US is $100. It’s five cents in Cuba. We claim these folks are our heroes, but we can’t take care of them when they are sick as a result of their work? After all, Rudolph Giuliani, Christie Todd Whitman and the rest of our government lied about the air quality in New York City for months!

One of the questions Michael Moore asked: How can we, as a society, condemn others to live this way?

You’ll laugh. You’ll cry. You’ll come out of the theater mad as hell. Again, this movie is accessible. If it doesn’t start the dialogue (and force a lot of people to take action,) we have nobody to blame but ourselves.

The revolution starts now.

-S

June 23, 2007

Dorothy Rabinowitz, you are SO off my Christmas card list

Filed under: Idiots, Scoundrels, and All-Around Undesirables — strategerie @ 1:40 pm

 bull.jpg

Here’s the tripe that passes as Pulitzer Prize-winning journalism, printed on the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal yesterday.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010243

I had to wait a day to write about it, because there’s no way in hell I’m paying to read this.

In the meantime, it seems Ms. Rabinowitz needs some assistance on fact-checking. Maybe she’s planning on another Pulitzer Prize in fiction, huh? Ms. Rabinowitz, please, please take yourself over to http://www.firedoglake.com and start your reading with the “CIA Leak Case” file. When you’re finished, pick up a copy of “Anatomy of Deceit” by Marcy Wheeler. Read it. You’ll then be qualified to comment. In the meantime, you might want to leave the commentary to those who know what they’re actually talking about.

Hugs and kisses,

-S

Oooh! Cut off Dick Cheney’s office’s funding? Why didn’t we do this with the Iraq war?

Filed under: Government hearings - more fun than reality TV, politics — strategerie @ 1:19 pm

It’s another fun-filled Saturday in the Strategerie/DoS household. What shall I tackle first — dishes, or laundry? The choices boggle, don’t they?

In the meantime, it seems that Dick Cheney doesn’t think he should have to answer to the little people. He (and his supposed boss,) have been stonewalling the National Archives since they came into office. They do not have to surrender their non-classified paperwork. After all, oversight is for wimps, isn’t it?

It seems that Mr. Emanuel has hit on a brilliant new idea: Let’s cut off his funding! If he doesn’t want to be a part of the Executive Branch, why not just defund him and his staff? Of course, Mr. Emanuel immediately erases any kind of traction on this idea by calling it a “stunt”. I call it good fiscal sense. If Mr. Cheney does not want to comply with the laws of our country in order to do his job, perhaps he should be replaced by someone who does. That, of course, goes double for Mr. Bush.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Democrats_plan_to_cut_Cheney_out_0623.html

There is the possibility that Mr. Cheney would choose to not accept a government salary. I’m sure it will be a relief to him to cut out the middleman; he can then get his paychecks directly from the entities he’s been working for since he came into office in the first place. (Halliburton, anyone?)

We won’t draw the extremely obvious parallel here — we can move to defund HIM and his office, but defunding the war in Iraq is just beyond the pale.

Maybe someone can explain this to me in one-syllable words so I can be sure and grasp them.

-S

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.